Embedded Files
In April 2023, operational governance was installed across two established private practices. Within existing provider capacity, production increased by $960,000 annually, accounts receivable was reduced by over 60%, and active patient volume grew by 27%. Growth was achieved through structured KPI oversight, revenue cycle discipline, and defined team accountability — not additional providers.
Case Study
Case Study
Multi-Location Operational Installation
Office A & Office B
(2023–2026 Performance Window)
Baseline – 2022
Baseline – 2022
Two established Midwest offices operating under the same model:
• Two providers/ 2 Locations
• 3.5 clinical days per week
• No formal KPI governance
• Reactive scheduling
• Accounts receivable exceeding $250,000
• Minimal front office infrastructure
Combined Production: $2.52M
Combined Collections: $2.34M
Active Patients: 2,554
The limitation was not demand.
It was structure.
Intervention – April 2023
Intervention – April 2023
Operational governance was installed.
This was not marketing. This was systems.
The following changes were implemented:
• Weekly KPI meetings with ownership
• Defined production and collections tracking
• Structured block scheduling aligned to targets
• Revenue cycle restructuring and aging discipline
• Recall tracking and reactivation accountability
• Clear front office role ownership
• Defined financial expectations and reporting cadence
Provider count remained unchanged.
Growth occurred within existing clinical capacity.
Measurable Results (2022 → 2025)
Measurable Results (2022 → 2025)
Revenue Growth
Revenue Growth
Combined Production:
$2.52M → $3.48M
+$960,000 annual increase
+38% growth
Collections Growth
Collections Growth
Combined Collections:
$2.34M → $3.14M
Revenue growth translated into stable cash performance.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts Receivable
A/R reduced from:
>$250,000 → <$100,000
Cash flow stabilized.
Aging was controlled.
Active Patient Growth
Active Patient Growth
Combined Active Patients:
2,554 → 3,245
+691 patients
+27% growth
Hygiene Retention Improvement
Hygiene Retention Improvement
Office A:
60.8% → 66.8%
Office B:
66.4% → 74.2%
Retention increased through recall structure and defined accountability.
Team Infrastructure Scale
Team Infrastructure Scale
Staffing expanded to support controlled growth:
From:
• 2 Dental Assistants
• 1 Front Desk
To:
• 5 Dental Assistants
• 4 Front Desk
• Hygiene pipeline established
Structure allowed scale without adding providers.
Sustained Performance Into 2025
Sustained Performance Into 2025
Performance levels established in 2024 remained materially elevated entering 2025.
Production and collections continued significantly above baseline.
The growth achieved was structural — not personality driven.
Operational Shift
Operational Shift
The transformation was governance-based.
Leadership moved from reactive management to KPI-driven accountability.
Performance scaled while provider count remained fixed.
Systems were installed that outlast leadership style.
Results may vary depending on team execution and adherence to installed systems.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse